| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: My point is ... if you want to work some kind of promotion deal with CCP then do something exceptional. There are no A's for effort. Ok. And my point is that I don't want a promotion deal with CCP (nor does anyone of the op...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.28 19:52:00
|
162. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: Yes I see your point. EVE is a place where everyone should feel like a winner all the time. "EVE is a place where no-one should feel like a loser because CCP directly supported his competition." is not the same as "EVE is a ...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.28 19:14:00
|
163. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RUS Comannder wrote: I am reading over an over again: waaah, waaah, giving a third party trillions in isk... wrong... Please don't misquote me, I'm sure I used more waaahs than that. Quote: why didn't you give it to us... waaah..... You'...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.28 18:02:00
|
164. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: I hope to god you're not suggesting these instances of favoritism be evaluated on a case-by-case basis!? Of course, how else should it be done? Life isn't easy, get over it! Quote: Who decides where this line is? Are y...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.27 16:13:00
|
165. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: Huge blatant favouritism is alright because it's not possible to get rid of every tiny piece of potentially perceived favouritism. Did I get that right? Your argument that sending devs to a Somer-sponsored event could theore...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.27 15:52:00
|
166. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
T'kimat wrote: Most likely scenario: Largest whinefest since monoclegate and CCP stops supporting player-run events, since there is no sign of constructive feedback - only blind rage. Well, if the supported events are ingame and for-profit the...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.27 12:03:00
|
167. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
T'kimat wrote: Andski wrote: EVE Vegas is an event that actually develops the community. A gambling event is not. Having a player run event in the United States in blatant favoritism towards Americans. Where exactly is the ingame advantage...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.27 09:57:00
|
168. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
arabella blood wrote: arabella blood wrote: Thanks to all bittervet RP lore loving players who missed the actualy point, we now have this pitiful solution. The point is not introducing back the ships, the point is the use of Blink to do it....
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.27 09:30:00
|
169. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: If CCP wants to compensate somer blink for helping promote eve vegas how is that anybody's business? Favouring one group over all its competitors is hurting the very core of the sandbox. And I happen to like that sandbox, so...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.27 08:26:00
|
170. Sticky:A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
First off: thanks CCP Navigator for still being up-front about this and once more showing good intentions and goodwill to handle this issue. You have successfully fixed the smaller issue by changing the ship types. Now to the less pleasent part: ...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.26 22:05:00
|
171. SOMER Blink - Microlotteries that Finish in Minutes! - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Dear CCP, there are several terrible ideas here: Re-introducing unique ships that don't exist anymore (i.e. Gold Magnate) This is the least terrible idea involved here, but it's still pretty bad. As many others have already said, this doesn...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.26 16:34:00
|
172. Sticky:Terms of Service History and Clarification Dev Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Laendra wrote: Malcanis wrote: And how exactly do these changes stop TQ "before it ends up like the chinese server"? Scamming and impersonation are destabilising, and are in fact one of the few ways that individuals and small groups c...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.26 12:59:00
|
173. Sticky:Dev Blog: A New Live Event for July - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ichitomo Kane wrote: Kendhor Maldosan wrote: Apparently I did something wrong in tier 3, since I didn't get the Low-Grade 'Virtue' Alpha implant. Can anyone please tell me where I failed? http://imgur.com/a/l23fw I cannot say for sure, ...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.21 11:22:00
|
174. API Servers: HTTP 403 on API error change - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Shin Chogan wrote: I didn't like it at first but I've actually found it has simplified TEA somewhat. How could that possibly be the case? You get just less info about errors than before, so there's literally nothing you can do now that you cou...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.20 11:37:00
|
175. API Servers: HTTP 403 on API error change - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
xHjfx wrote: The old one caused alot of load on the API servers Would you happen to have a source on that (i.e. word from a dev) or is this an assumption? Cause if I were to make an assumption I'd say the new system causes more load on the API...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.20 11:23:00
|
176. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Echo Echoplex wrote: GM Grimmi wrote: You cannot impersonate yourself. Impersonating yourself does not follow good logic since you are yourself and that is not a violation of any policies we have. Yet again, someone is telli...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.20 07:53:00
|
177. Sticky:Dev Blog: A New Live Event for July - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Unezka Turigahl wrote: Kendhor Maldosan wrote: Apparently I did something wrong in tier 3, since I didn't get the Low-Grade 'Virtue' Alpha implant. Can anyone please tell me where I failed? http://imgur.com/a/l23fw You used a pod for a...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.19 06:54:00
|
178. API Servers: HTTP 403 on API error change - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
xHjfx wrote: It's no where near doom and gloom, just not as informative as the old system - you just actually have to bother to re code for the changes. The issue here is that no matter how hard you recode, the new system has way less functio...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.18 19:28:00
|
179. Fetching character skills and portrait. - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
All the API info you'll ever need: http://wiki.eve-id.net/APIv2_Page_Index For skills you want CharacterSheet. For character portraits use the image server: http://image.eveonline.com/ Edit: I maybe should've mentioned you get the character ...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.18 09:17:00
|
180. Sticky:Terms of Service CSM Feedback Thread - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
mmorpg lol wrote: Rob Crowley wrote: "You may not impersonate or falsely present yourself to be a representative of CCP or of an EVE Online volunteer group. You may not impersonate or falsely present yourself or your corporation or alli...
- by Rob Crowley - at 2013.09.17 18:23:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |